Osho – Buddhism is not interested in general policy. It is not interested in philosophical speculation. It is interested in the details of life, its sufferings and their causes. It does not give you outlandish solutions. It does not provide you with new dreams. It simply looks face to face into life. It does not bring God in, or heaven and hell.
It does not create a theology at all – because all theology is an effort to escape from the real problems of life. So sometimes it happens to philosophers, to theologians, that Buddhism seems to be not a religion at all, because it does not talk about paradise, it does not talk about the eternal soul. It talks about the suffering, the misery, the frustration, the anxiety, the anguish of life.
Many have thought that Buddhism is pessimistic – it is not. It simply wants to face the life as it is, and life IS misery, and life is anguish. The easy way to avoid it is to escape into abstraction, to move into some dreamlands, to start thinking, about something else, to spin and weave theories so that you can hide the fact, the wound of life.
Buddhism is very earthly, earthbound, factual. It wants you to encounter life, because only through encountering the anguish of life is there a possibility of transcendence. But people don’t want to face life. They are afraid. They are frightened. Deep down they know that life is anxiety. To face it means to become anxious, troubled.
To face it means it will become impossible to live. To face it means you will be paralyzed – paralyzed by fear, paralyzed by death, because life is death and nothing else. Everything is dying every moment. All is disappearing into death. Buddhism says escaping into abstractions is not going to help. Going into the details of life is really going to help.
It is hard, it is arduous, it needs guts – but that’s the only way to face it. Down the ages, priests have been exploiting people. They have been giving people easy routes to escape by. They have been deceiving people. Priests have never allowed people to become literate, to become intelligent, because if people become literate and intelligent they will be able to see through the whole game that priests have been playing around.
The priests have depended on the ignorance of human beings, and they have tried to keep human beings as ignorant as possible. The religious scriptures should not be allowed; people should not read them. In India, only Brahmins were allowed to read the Vedas, because if people are allowed to read the Vedas, then how long can you pretend that there is something in it? There is nothing!
People will see it. And once they have seen it, how are you going to deceive them? How are you going to exploit them? The power of the priests and the politicians depends on the ignorance of men. Buddhism brings a totally different light. Buddhism says: Forget about the Vedas and the Upanishads; don’t be worried about them.
Your life is enough to go into – that is the real Veda. The only book that has to be read is the book of life, and the only wisdom that is possible is through reading the book of life. Become intelligent. Buddhism is the religion of intelligence. The word ’buddha’ comes from ’buddhi’ – buddhi means intelligence. It is only through intelligence that one can become aware.
this gives an account of how Buddhism could have started against Vedas, Upanishads abd Brhmins. But it is how it is made out to be later, when Buddhists were attcked by Brhmins and sent away from India. but origin of Buddhism is different. OSho is a flow of thought. he take one point and jsut bangs than giving any logical explanation though there is a bit of truth in it. As he rightly said, like every religious Guru, he too depnedent on ignorance of masses especially His follwers. The problem with mind is that it ialways believes what we think is right unless we become open minded. OSHO is not open minded person. many Brhamins were afraid, many Hindus tortured Buddhists , but his own family history tells that they did not oppose Buddhism and in fact embraced Buddhism. OSho never had to answer as none of his devotess were alowed to speak.